Why this chapter matters for UPSC: State government functioning — the role of the Governor, Chief Minister, state legislature — and the federal division of powers are core GS2 Polity topics. The Governor's role (discretionary powers, Article 356 President's Rule) is heavily tested.
PART 1 — Quick Reference Tables
State Government Structure
| Position | Constitutional Basis | Key Role |
|---|---|---|
| Governor | Articles 153–162 | Constitutional head of state; appointed by President; represents Union in state |
| Chief Minister (CM) | Article 163–164 | Real executive head; leader of majority party; heads Council of Ministers |
| Council of Ministers | Article 163–164 | Collectively responsible to Vidhan Sabha; advises Governor |
| Vidhan Sabha (Legislative Assembly) | Article 170 | Lower house; directly elected; passes laws, budget; maximum 500 seats, minimum 60 |
| Vidhan Parishad (Legislative Council) | Article 169–171 | Upper house; only 6 states have it; not directly elected; less powerful |
States with Vidhan Parishad (Upper House)
| State |
|---|
| Uttar Pradesh |
| Bihar |
| Maharashtra |
| Karnataka |
| Andhra Pradesh |
| Telangana |
Only these 6 states have a Vidhan Parishad (as of 2025). A state legislature can create/abolish the Vidhan Parishad by resolution (Article 169).
PART 2 — Detailed Notes
The Governor
Governor — constitutional head of the state:
Appointment: By the President of India (on advice of the Central government — effectively the Union Cabinet).
Term: 5 years; can be transferred or removed earlier by the President.
Constitutional powers:
- Appoints Chief Minister (and on CM's advice, other ministers)
- Summons, prorogues, dissolves Vidhan Sabha
- Grants assent to state bills (or withholds, or reserves for President's consideration)
- Addresses joint sessions of state legislature
- Reports to President about state affairs — key input for imposing President's Rule
Discretionary powers (controversial):
- Inviting the leader of the largest party/alliance to form government when no majority is clear
- Sending bills to the President for consideration instead of giving assent
- Recommending President's Rule (Article 356) when constitutional machinery fails
- Article 200: Governor can withhold assent to a bill — this power has been used controversially in recent times (courts have ruled Governors must act within time limits)
Controversies around Governor's role:
- Governors are sometimes accused of acting as agents of the Centre, creating friction with state governments of opposition parties
- SR Bommai case (1994): SC ruled that strength of government must be tested on the floor of the house, NOT by Governor's subjective assessment — curtailed misuse of Article 356
- Article 356 (President's Rule): Can be imposed on Governor's report that state government cannot function. Has been misused historically (used 100+ times; greatly reduced after SR Bommai).
Chief Minister and Council of Ministers
UPSC GS2 — State Executive:
Chief Minister:
- Leader of the party/coalition with majority in Vidhan Sabha
- Appointed by Governor (Governor must appoint the person who can command a majority)
- Real executive; heads the Council of Ministers (Cabinet)
- Article 164: CM and ministers collectively responsible to Vidhan Sabha
Council of Ministers:
- Collective responsibility: If government loses a no-confidence motion in Vidhan Sabha, the entire Council of Ministers must resign
- Cabinet system: Most important decisions made by Cabinet (senior ministers); CM chairs Cabinet
- Individual responsibility: A minister who loses the confidence of CM must resign
Who can be a minister:
- Must be a member of the state legislature (Vidhan Sabha or Parishad); OR must become a member within 6 months of appointment
Size of Council of Ministers (91st Amendment, 2003):
- Maximum size: 15% of total strength of Vidhan Sabha (or minimum of 12 ministers for small states)
- Purpose: Prevent "bloated" cabinets that became a patronage problem
State Legislature (Vidhan Sabha):
- MLA (Member of Legislative Assembly) = directly elected representative from a constituency
- Minimum age: 25 years
- Term: 5 years (unless dissolved earlier)
- Powers: Passes state budget, state laws (on State List + Concurrent List), no-confidence motion
- Money Bill: Can be introduced only in Vidhan Sabha; Vidhan Parishad can delay maximum 14 days but cannot reject
Division of Powers — Centre vs State
7th Schedule of the Constitution — Three Lists:
Union List (List I):
- Only Parliament can make laws
- 100 subjects (earlier 97): Defence, foreign affairs, currency, banking, communications, nuclear energy, railways, citizenship
- Example: Nuclear power, armed forces, income tax, customs duties
State List (List II):
- State legislatures can make laws
- 61 subjects (earlier 66): Police, public order, agriculture, public health, local government, land, roads
- Parliament CAN legislate on State List subjects in certain situations (Article 249, 250, 252, 253)
Concurrent List (List III):
- Both Parliament and state legislatures can make laws
- 52 subjects (earlier 47): Education, marriage, divorce, forests, population control, labour, electricity
- In case of conflict: Central law prevails (Article 254)
- Education moved to Concurrent List by 42nd Amendment (1976) — was originally State List
Residuary powers: Parliament (any subject NOT in any list) — Article 248
Recent centralization trends:
- New farm laws (2020): Parliament legislated on agriculture (State List item) using Concurrent List entry on trade → controversy → farm laws repealed (2021) after protests
- Article 356 misuse: Curtailed by SR Bommai (1994)
- GST: States gave up their taxation powers; compensated for 5 years (ended 2022); ongoing disputes over GST compensation
[Additional] 3a. Governor's Discretionary Powers — Key Supreme Court Judgments (1974–2025)
The chapter covers the Governor's role and SR Bommai (1994) but lacks the more recent landmark judgments — Nabam Rebia (2016), Punjab Governor (2023), Tamil Nadu Governor (2025) — that define the current law on Governors' discretionary powers and have been directly tested in UPSC GS2.
Key Terms — Governor's Powers and Recent Judgments:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Samsher Singh (1974) | Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab — 7-judge bench (23 August 1974); held Governor (like President) must act on aid and advice of Council of Ministers in all matters except where Constitution expressly grants personal discretion; discretionary powers are exceptions, NOT the norm |
| Nabam Rebia (2016) | Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker — (2016) 8 SCC 1; 5-judge bench; July 13, 2016; held Governor cannot unilaterally summon/prorogue/advance assembly session without Council of Ministers' advice; Article 174 must be read with Article 163 |
| Article 200 | Governor's options when a state bill is presented: (1) Assent; (2) Withhold + return for Legislature's reconsideration (except Money Bills); (3) Reserve for President's consideration; if Legislature re-passes a returned bill, Governor shall give assent (cannot withhold a second time) |
| Punjab Governor (2023) | Two SC rulings: (1) Feb 28, 2023 — Governor cannot refuse to summon assembly on CoM advice; (2) Nov 10, 2023 (2023 INSC 1017) — Governor cannot question validity of a legislative session to withhold assent to bills |
| Tamil Nadu Governor (2025) | April 8, 2025 SC ruled Governor cannot withhold assent indefinitely; November 20, 2025 Presidential Reference (2025 INSC 1333) — 5-judge bench partially walked back: no fixed timelines can be judicially imposed; decisions under Articles 200/201 are not justiciable |
[Additional] Governor's Powers — Key Supreme Court Judgments (GS2 — Polity / State Executive):
The foundational principle — Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974):
- 7-judge Constitution Bench — decided August 23, 1974; AIR 1974 SC 2192
- Core holding: The Governor is a constitutional head who must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in all executive matters; discretionary powers are the exception, not the rule
- Express discretionary exceptions in the Constitution are narrow — only specified provisions in 6th Schedule and certain NE state provisions
- Established: Governors cannot exercise personal judgment in routine executive matters
Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016) — Arunachal Pradesh:
- Citation: (2016) 8 SCC 1; decided July 13, 2016; 5-judge Constitution Bench
- Facts: Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa preponed the Assembly session by one month WITHOUT consulting the Chief Minister or Council of Ministers — creating conditions for anti-incumbency motion
- Holdings:
- Governor cannot summon, prorogue, or advance a legislative session without Council of Ministers' advice — Article 174 must be read with Article 163
- Governor's unilateral order preponing session was unconstitutional — quashed
- A Speaker cannot disqualify MLAs while a motion for the Speaker's own removal is pending
- Gubernatorial actions under Article 174 are subject to judicial review
- SC effectively nullified the President's Rule imposed during the crisis and restored the elected government
Article 200 — Governor's three options on bills:
| Option | Provision | Key Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Assent | Article 200(1) | Bill becomes law |
| Withhold + Return | Article 200, 2nd proviso | Only for non-Money Bills; if Legislature re-passes it, Governor shall assent — cannot withhold again |
| Reserve for President | Article 200, 1st proviso | Mandatory if Bill endangers HC position; Governor may also reserve other bills |
Key limitation: Governor cannot return a Money Bill — only option is assent or reserve for President.
Punjab Governor cases (2023):
| Judgment | Date | Key Holding |
|---|---|---|
| State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to Governor | February 28, 2023 | Governor cannot refuse to summon assembly session when Council of Ministers so advises — bound by CoM advice; no scope for seeking "legal opinion" on whether to summon |
| State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023 INSC 1017) | November 10, 2023 | Governor cannot question the validity of a legislative session as a basis to withhold assent to bills passed in that session; Governor directed to decide on four pending bills |
Kerala Governor (2023–2024):
- Governor Arif Mohammed Khan kept 8 Bills pending for 2+ years without any reason
- Kerala filed writ petition in SC on November 1, 2023
- SC criticized the Governor (November 2023): "No reason has been given to keep bills pending"
- Governor's subsequent act of referring bills directly to President (bypassing Legislature reconsideration step) was further challenged
Tamil Nadu Governor — current law (2025):
| Stage | Date | Judgment | Holding |
|---|---|---|---|
| HC/State petition | 2023 | — | Tamil Nadu challenged Governor R.N. Ravi sitting on bills for 17+ months |
| SC Judgment | April 8, 2025 | 2025 INSC 481 | Governor cannot withhold assent indefinitely; "withholding" = temporary deferral, NOT permanent denial; if Legislature re-passes returned bill, Governor MUST assent; judicial review (mandamus) available |
| Presidential Reference Opinion | November 20, 2025 | 2025 INSC 1333 | Partially overruled April 2025 — courts cannot impose fixed timelines on Governor/President; decisions under Articles 200/201 are not justiciable; but indefinite delay remains improper |
Current legal position (post-November 2025): Governor cannot create a "pocket veto" by indefinitely sitting on bills, but courts cannot mandate a fixed timeline for the Governor or President to decide — the tension between these two principles remains unresolved.
UPSC synthesis: Governor's powers = GS2 Polity. Key exam facts: Samsher Singh = 1974 = 7-judge bench = Governor acts on CoM advice in all matters except express Constitutional exceptions; Nabam Rebia = (2016) 8 SCC 1 = 5-judge bench = Governor cannot unilaterally summon/prorogue assembly = quashed President's Rule in Arunachal; Article 200 = three options: assent / return (Governor SHALL give assent if Legislature re-passes) / reserve for President; Punjab Governor judgment = 2023 INSC 1017 (November 10, 2023) = Governor cannot question session validity to withhold assent; Tamil Nadu = April 8, 2025 = no indefinite delay; Presidential Reference = November 20, 2025 = no fixed timelines = decisions not fully justiciable. Prelims trap: If Legislature re-passes a returned bill, Governor SHALL assent (NOT may; NOT can withhold again); Nabam Rebia is an Arunachal Pradesh case (NOT Punjab — Punjab is the 2023 Governor case); Samsher Singh = 7 judges (NOT 5 or 9); the Tamil Nadu 2025 judgment was partially overruled by Presidential Reference (November 2025) — so the April 2025 ruling is NOT the final word; Governor cannot return a Money Bill — the "withhold + return" option is only for ordinary bills.
[Additional] 3b. Inter-State Relations — Articles 262–263, Zonal Councils, and Cauvery Water Dispute
The chapter covers Centre-State relations but lacks inter-state relations — Articles 262 and 263, the Inter-State Council, Zonal Councils, river water dispute tribunals, and the Cauvery case — which are directly tested in UPSC GS2 (Federalism, Administration).
Key Terms — Inter-State Relations:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Article 262 | Enables Parliament to make law for adjudication of inter-state river water disputes; also enables Parliament to bar Supreme Court jurisdiction over such disputes; basis for Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956 |
| Article 263 | Enables President to establish an Inter-State Council (ISC) for coordination between states and Centre; ISC constituted May 28, 1990 on Sarkaria Commission recommendation |
| Inter-State Council | Constituted May 28, 1990; Chairman = Prime Minister; reconstituted November 2024; promotes cooperative federalism, resolves inter-state issues through consultation |
| Zonal Councils | 5 advisory bodies established under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT under Article 263 — statutory, not constitutional); Chairman = Union Home Minister for all 5; discuss regional issues, border disputes, inter-state transport |
| ISRWD Act 1956 | Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956 — enacted under Article 262; provides for Tribunals to adjudicate river water disputes; 9 Tribunals constituted so far |
| CWDT | Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal — constituted June 2, 1990; final award February 5, 2007; modified by Supreme Court on February 16, 2018 |
[Additional] Inter-State Relations — Articles 262–263, River Disputes, Zonal Councils (GS2 — Polity / Federalism):
Article 262 — Inter-State River Water Disputes:
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it enables | Parliament to make law for adjudication of inter-state river water disputes |
| Key power | Parliament can bar Supreme Court and all courts from exercising jurisdiction over such disputes (and has done so) |
| Statutes under Article 262 | (1) River Boards Act, 1956 — for advisory River Boards (none actually constituted yet); (2) Inter-State River Water Disputes Act (ISRWD Act), 1956 — for Tribunals |
| Total Tribunals constituted | 9 under the ISRWD Act 1956 |
Nine river water dispute Tribunals (ISRWD Act 1956):
| Tribunal | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Krishna-I (Bachawat) | 1969 | Award notified |
| Godavari | 1969 | Award notified |
| Narmada | 1969 | Award notified |
| Ravi and Beas | 1986 | First report 1987; proceedings pending ~39 years |
| Cauvery (CWDT) | 1990 | Final award 2007; modified by SC 2018 |
| Krishna-II (Brijesh Kumar) | 2004 | Partial report submitted |
| Vamsadhara | 2010 | Pending/partial |
| Mahadayi | 2010 | Award notified |
| Mahanadi | 2018 | Pending adjudication |
Cauvery Water Dispute — complete timeline:
| Event | Date | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| CWDT constituted | June 2, 1990 | Headed by Justice Chittatosh Mookerjee |
| CWDT Final Award | February 5, 2007 | After 17 years; total assumed water: 740 TMC/year |
| Supreme Court Judgment | February 16, 2018 | Cauvery declared national asset; Centre to notify Cauvery Management Scheme; modified CWDT allocations |
Cauvery 2018 SC allocation (modified from CWDT 2007):
| State/UT | CWDT 2007 | SC 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Tamil Nadu | 419 TMC | 404.25 TMC (reduced by 14.75) |
| Karnataka | 270 TMC | 284.75 TMC (increased by 14.75) |
| Kerala | 30 TMC | 30 TMC (unchanged) |
| Puducherry | 7 TMC | 7 TMC (unchanged) |
SC verdict validity: 15 years from 2018.
Article 263 — Inter-State Council:
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constituted | May 28, 1990 (Presidential Order) |
| Basis | Recommendation of Sarkaria Commission (report: 1988) |
| Chairman | Prime Minister (ex officio) |
| Members | Chief Ministers of all states + UTs with legislatures; Administrators of UTs without legislatures; specified Union Cabinet Ministers |
| Reconstituted | November 2024 — PM Modi as chairman; 9 Union Ministers as core members + all CMs; 13 additional Union Ministers as invitees |
| Functions | Inquire into inter-state disputes; investigate subjects of common interest; recommend policy co-ordination between Centre and states |
| Article 263 powers | Three: (a) arbitrate disputes between states; (b) investigate common interest subjects; (c) recommend for better co-ordination |
Zonal Councils — five advisory bodies:
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Established | 1956 under States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (NOT under Article 263 — statutory, not constitutional) |
| Number | 5 Zonal Councils (Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, Southern) |
| Separate body | North-Eastern Council — established separately under NE Council Act, 1971 |
| Common Chairman | Union Home Minister chairs all 5 Zonal Councils |
| Vice-Chairman | Chief Ministers of states in that zone rotate |
| Functions | Advisory: border disputes, inter-state transport, economic planning coordination, linguistic minority issues |
| Nature | Advisory, not legislative — recommendations not binding |
UPSC synthesis: Inter-State relations = GS2 Federalism. Key exam facts: Article 262 = inter-state river disputes = Parliament can bar SC jurisdiction; 9 Tribunals under ISRWD Act 1956; Cauvery Tribunal = constituted June 2, 1990 = final award February 5, 2007 = SC verdict February 16, 2018 = Tamil Nadu 404.25 TMC + Karnataka 284.75 TMC; Article 263 = Inter-State Council = constituted May 28, 1990 = Sarkaria Commission recommendation = Chairman = PM = reconstituted November 2024; Zonal Councils = 5 = established under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT Article 263 — common confusion) = Chairman = Union Home Minister; NE Council = separate = 1971 Act. Prelims trap: Zonal Councils are under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT Article 263 — Article 263 created the ISC; Zonal Councils are statutory, not constitutional); ISC Chairman = Prime Minister (NOT President and NOT Home Minister; Zonal Councils chairman = Home Minister); Cauvery SC 2018 = Tamil Nadu got reduced allocation (from 419 → 404.25 TMC) = Karnataka got increased (270 → 284.75 TMC); Article 262 allows Parliament to bar SC jurisdiction over river disputes (this is exceptional — Parliament has actually barred SC jurisdiction under the ISRWD Act); 9 Tribunals (NOT 6 or 7 — 9 total as of 2018 when Mahanadi was the latest).
Exam Strategy
Prelims traps:
- Governor appointed by President (NOT elected — this is the key difference from the President at the Centre who is elected by an Electoral College)
- Vidhan Parishad exists in ONLY 6 states (UP, Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana)
- Article 356 = President's Rule; SR Bommai case (1994) restricted its misuse — floor test required
- 91st Amendment (2003): Council of Ministers max = 15% of Vidhan Sabha strength
- Education = Concurrent List (NOT State List — moved by 42nd Amendment 1976)
- Governor's term = 5 years but serves at pleasure of President (can be removed any time)
- Money Bill in states: Introduced in Vidhan Sabha only; Vidhan Parishad can delay max 14 days (parallel to Rajya Sabha's 14 days on money bills)
Practice Questions
Prelims:
The Governor of a state is appointed by the:
(a) Chief Justice of India
(b) President of India
(c) Prime Minister of India
(d) State Legislature through proportional representationWhich constitutional amendment set a limit of 15% of the total strength of the legislative assembly as the maximum size of a state's Council of Ministers?
(a) 44th Amendment
(b) 73rd Amendment
(c) 91st Amendment
(d) 100th AmendmentThe subject of "Education" is placed in which Schedule/List of the Constitution?
(a) Union List
(b) Concurrent List
(c) State List
(d) Residuary list (not enumerated)
BharatNotes