Why this chapter matters for UPSC: State government functioning — the role of the Governor, Chief Minister, state legislature — and the federal division of powers are core GS2 Polity topics. The Governor's role (discretionary powers, Article 356 President's Rule) is heavily tested.


PART 1 — Quick Reference Tables

State Government Structure

PositionConstitutional BasisKey Role
GovernorArticles 153–162Constitutional head of state; appointed by President; represents Union in state
Chief Minister (CM)Article 163–164Real executive head; leader of majority party; heads Council of Ministers
Council of MinistersArticle 163–164Collectively responsible to Vidhan Sabha; advises Governor
Vidhan Sabha (Legislative Assembly)Article 170Lower house; directly elected; passes laws, budget; maximum 500 seats, minimum 60
Vidhan Parishad (Legislative Council)Article 169–171Upper house; only 6 states have it; not directly elected; less powerful

States with Vidhan Parishad (Upper House)

State
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Maharashtra
Karnataka
Andhra Pradesh
Telangana

Only these 6 states have a Vidhan Parishad (as of 2025). A state legislature can create/abolish the Vidhan Parishad by resolution (Article 169).


PART 2 — Detailed Notes

The Governor

Key Term

Governor — constitutional head of the state:

Appointment: By the President of India (on advice of the Central government — effectively the Union Cabinet).

Term: 5 years; can be transferred or removed earlier by the President.

Constitutional powers:

  • Appoints Chief Minister (and on CM's advice, other ministers)
  • Summons, prorogues, dissolves Vidhan Sabha
  • Grants assent to state bills (or withholds, or reserves for President's consideration)
  • Addresses joint sessions of state legislature
  • Reports to President about state affairs — key input for imposing President's Rule

Discretionary powers (controversial):

  • Inviting the leader of the largest party/alliance to form government when no majority is clear
  • Sending bills to the President for consideration instead of giving assent
  • Recommending President's Rule (Article 356) when constitutional machinery fails
  • Article 200: Governor can withhold assent to a bill — this power has been used controversially in recent times (courts have ruled Governors must act within time limits)

Controversies around Governor's role:

  • Governors are sometimes accused of acting as agents of the Centre, creating friction with state governments of opposition parties
  • SR Bommai case (1994): SC ruled that strength of government must be tested on the floor of the house, NOT by Governor's subjective assessment — curtailed misuse of Article 356
  • Article 356 (President's Rule): Can be imposed on Governor's report that state government cannot function. Has been misused historically (used 100+ times; greatly reduced after SR Bommai).

Chief Minister and Council of Ministers

UPSC Connect

UPSC GS2 — State Executive:

Chief Minister:

  • Leader of the party/coalition with majority in Vidhan Sabha
  • Appointed by Governor (Governor must appoint the person who can command a majority)
  • Real executive; heads the Council of Ministers (Cabinet)
  • Article 164: CM and ministers collectively responsible to Vidhan Sabha

Council of Ministers:

  • Collective responsibility: If government loses a no-confidence motion in Vidhan Sabha, the entire Council of Ministers must resign
  • Cabinet system: Most important decisions made by Cabinet (senior ministers); CM chairs Cabinet
  • Individual responsibility: A minister who loses the confidence of CM must resign

Who can be a minister:

  • Must be a member of the state legislature (Vidhan Sabha or Parishad); OR must become a member within 6 months of appointment

Size of Council of Ministers (91st Amendment, 2003):

  • Maximum size: 15% of total strength of Vidhan Sabha (or minimum of 12 ministers for small states)
  • Purpose: Prevent "bloated" cabinets that became a patronage problem

State Legislature (Vidhan Sabha):

  • MLA (Member of Legislative Assembly) = directly elected representative from a constituency
  • Minimum age: 25 years
  • Term: 5 years (unless dissolved earlier)
  • Powers: Passes state budget, state laws (on State List + Concurrent List), no-confidence motion
  • Money Bill: Can be introduced only in Vidhan Sabha; Vidhan Parishad can delay maximum 14 days but cannot reject

Division of Powers — Centre vs State

Explainer

7th Schedule of the Constitution — Three Lists:

Union List (List I):

  • Only Parliament can make laws
  • 100 subjects (earlier 97): Defence, foreign affairs, currency, banking, communications, nuclear energy, railways, citizenship
  • Example: Nuclear power, armed forces, income tax, customs duties

State List (List II):

  • State legislatures can make laws
  • 61 subjects (earlier 66): Police, public order, agriculture, public health, local government, land, roads
  • Parliament CAN legislate on State List subjects in certain situations (Article 249, 250, 252, 253)

Concurrent List (List III):

  • Both Parliament and state legislatures can make laws
  • 52 subjects (earlier 47): Education, marriage, divorce, forests, population control, labour, electricity
  • In case of conflict: Central law prevails (Article 254)
  • Education moved to Concurrent List by 42nd Amendment (1976) — was originally State List

Residuary powers: Parliament (any subject NOT in any list) — Article 248

Recent centralization trends:

  • New farm laws (2020): Parliament legislated on agriculture (State List item) using Concurrent List entry on trade → controversy → farm laws repealed (2021) after protests
  • Article 356 misuse: Curtailed by SR Bommai (1994)
  • GST: States gave up their taxation powers; compensated for 5 years (ended 2022); ongoing disputes over GST compensation

[Additional] 3a. Governor's Discretionary Powers — Key Supreme Court Judgments (1974–2025)

The chapter covers the Governor's role and SR Bommai (1994) but lacks the more recent landmark judgments — Nabam Rebia (2016), Punjab Governor (2023), Tamil Nadu Governor (2025) — that define the current law on Governors' discretionary powers and have been directly tested in UPSC GS2.

Key Term

Key Terms — Governor's Powers and Recent Judgments:

TermMeaning
Samsher Singh (1974)Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab7-judge bench (23 August 1974); held Governor (like President) must act on aid and advice of Council of Ministers in all matters except where Constitution expressly grants personal discretion; discretionary powers are exceptions, NOT the norm
Nabam Rebia (2016)Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker(2016) 8 SCC 1; 5-judge bench; July 13, 2016; held Governor cannot unilaterally summon/prorogue/advance assembly session without Council of Ministers' advice; Article 174 must be read with Article 163
Article 200Governor's options when a state bill is presented: (1) Assent; (2) Withhold + return for Legislature's reconsideration (except Money Bills); (3) Reserve for President's consideration; if Legislature re-passes a returned bill, Governor shall give assent (cannot withhold a second time)
Punjab Governor (2023)Two SC rulings: (1) Feb 28, 2023 — Governor cannot refuse to summon assembly on CoM advice; (2) Nov 10, 2023 (2023 INSC 1017) — Governor cannot question validity of a legislative session to withhold assent to bills
Tamil Nadu Governor (2025)April 8, 2025 SC ruled Governor cannot withhold assent indefinitely; November 20, 2025 Presidential Reference (2025 INSC 1333) — 5-judge bench partially walked back: no fixed timelines can be judicially imposed; decisions under Articles 200/201 are not justiciable
UPSC Connect

[Additional] Governor's Powers — Key Supreme Court Judgments (GS2 — Polity / State Executive):

The foundational principle — Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974):

  • 7-judge Constitution Bench — decided August 23, 1974; AIR 1974 SC 2192
  • Core holding: The Governor is a constitutional head who must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in all executive matters; discretionary powers are the exception, not the rule
  • Express discretionary exceptions in the Constitution are narrow — only specified provisions in 6th Schedule and certain NE state provisions
  • Established: Governors cannot exercise personal judgment in routine executive matters

Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016) — Arunachal Pradesh:

  • Citation: (2016) 8 SCC 1; decided July 13, 2016; 5-judge Constitution Bench
  • Facts: Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa preponed the Assembly session by one month WITHOUT consulting the Chief Minister or Council of Ministers — creating conditions for anti-incumbency motion
  • Holdings:
    • Governor cannot summon, prorogue, or advance a legislative session without Council of Ministers' advice — Article 174 must be read with Article 163
    • Governor's unilateral order preponing session was unconstitutional — quashed
    • A Speaker cannot disqualify MLAs while a motion for the Speaker's own removal is pending
    • Gubernatorial actions under Article 174 are subject to judicial review
    • SC effectively nullified the President's Rule imposed during the crisis and restored the elected government

Article 200 — Governor's three options on bills:

OptionProvisionKey Condition
AssentArticle 200(1)Bill becomes law
Withhold + ReturnArticle 200, 2nd provisoOnly for non-Money Bills; if Legislature re-passes it, Governor shall assent — cannot withhold again
Reserve for PresidentArticle 200, 1st provisoMandatory if Bill endangers HC position; Governor may also reserve other bills

Key limitation: Governor cannot return a Money Bill — only option is assent or reserve for President.

Punjab Governor cases (2023):

JudgmentDateKey Holding
State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to GovernorFebruary 28, 2023Governor cannot refuse to summon assembly session when Council of Ministers so advises — bound by CoM advice; no scope for seeking "legal opinion" on whether to summon
State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary (2023 INSC 1017)November 10, 2023Governor cannot question the validity of a legislative session as a basis to withhold assent to bills passed in that session; Governor directed to decide on four pending bills

Kerala Governor (2023–2024):

  • Governor Arif Mohammed Khan kept 8 Bills pending for 2+ years without any reason
  • Kerala filed writ petition in SC on November 1, 2023
  • SC criticized the Governor (November 2023): "No reason has been given to keep bills pending"
  • Governor's subsequent act of referring bills directly to President (bypassing Legislature reconsideration step) was further challenged

Tamil Nadu Governor — current law (2025):

StageDateJudgmentHolding
HC/State petition2023Tamil Nadu challenged Governor R.N. Ravi sitting on bills for 17+ months
SC JudgmentApril 8, 20252025 INSC 481Governor cannot withhold assent indefinitely; "withholding" = temporary deferral, NOT permanent denial; if Legislature re-passes returned bill, Governor MUST assent; judicial review (mandamus) available
Presidential Reference OpinionNovember 20, 20252025 INSC 1333Partially overruled April 2025 — courts cannot impose fixed timelines on Governor/President; decisions under Articles 200/201 are not justiciable; but indefinite delay remains improper

Current legal position (post-November 2025): Governor cannot create a "pocket veto" by indefinitely sitting on bills, but courts cannot mandate a fixed timeline for the Governor or President to decide — the tension between these two principles remains unresolved.

UPSC synthesis: Governor's powers = GS2 Polity. Key exam facts: Samsher Singh = 1974 = 7-judge bench = Governor acts on CoM advice in all matters except express Constitutional exceptions; Nabam Rebia = (2016) 8 SCC 1 = 5-judge bench = Governor cannot unilaterally summon/prorogue assembly = quashed President's Rule in Arunachal; Article 200 = three options: assent / return (Governor SHALL give assent if Legislature re-passes) / reserve for President; Punjab Governor judgment = 2023 INSC 1017 (November 10, 2023) = Governor cannot question session validity to withhold assent; Tamil Nadu = April 8, 2025 = no indefinite delay; Presidential Reference = November 20, 2025 = no fixed timelines = decisions not fully justiciable. Prelims trap: If Legislature re-passes a returned bill, Governor SHALL assent (NOT may; NOT can withhold again); Nabam Rebia is an Arunachal Pradesh case (NOT Punjab — Punjab is the 2023 Governor case); Samsher Singh = 7 judges (NOT 5 or 9); the Tamil Nadu 2025 judgment was partially overruled by Presidential Reference (November 2025) — so the April 2025 ruling is NOT the final word; Governor cannot return a Money Bill — the "withhold + return" option is only for ordinary bills.

[Additional] 3b. Inter-State Relations — Articles 262–263, Zonal Councils, and Cauvery Water Dispute

The chapter covers Centre-State relations but lacks inter-state relations — Articles 262 and 263, the Inter-State Council, Zonal Councils, river water dispute tribunals, and the Cauvery case — which are directly tested in UPSC GS2 (Federalism, Administration).

Key Term

Key Terms — Inter-State Relations:

TermMeaning
Article 262Enables Parliament to make law for adjudication of inter-state river water disputes; also enables Parliament to bar Supreme Court jurisdiction over such disputes; basis for Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956
Article 263Enables President to establish an Inter-State Council (ISC) for coordination between states and Centre; ISC constituted May 28, 1990 on Sarkaria Commission recommendation
Inter-State CouncilConstituted May 28, 1990; Chairman = Prime Minister; reconstituted November 2024; promotes cooperative federalism, resolves inter-state issues through consultation
Zonal Councils5 advisory bodies established under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT under Article 263 — statutory, not constitutional); Chairman = Union Home Minister for all 5; discuss regional issues, border disputes, inter-state transport
ISRWD Act 1956Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956 — enacted under Article 262; provides for Tribunals to adjudicate river water disputes; 9 Tribunals constituted so far
CWDTCauvery Water Disputes Tribunal — constituted June 2, 1990; final award February 5, 2007; modified by Supreme Court on February 16, 2018
UPSC Connect

[Additional] Inter-State Relations — Articles 262–263, River Disputes, Zonal Councils (GS2 — Polity / Federalism):

Article 262 — Inter-State River Water Disputes:

FeatureDetail
What it enablesParliament to make law for adjudication of inter-state river water disputes
Key powerParliament can bar Supreme Court and all courts from exercising jurisdiction over such disputes (and has done so)
Statutes under Article 262(1) River Boards Act, 1956 — for advisory River Boards (none actually constituted yet); (2) Inter-State River Water Disputes Act (ISRWD Act), 1956 — for Tribunals
Total Tribunals constituted9 under the ISRWD Act 1956

Nine river water dispute Tribunals (ISRWD Act 1956):

TribunalYearStatus
Krishna-I (Bachawat)1969Award notified
Godavari1969Award notified
Narmada1969Award notified
Ravi and Beas1986First report 1987; proceedings pending ~39 years
Cauvery (CWDT)1990Final award 2007; modified by SC 2018
Krishna-II (Brijesh Kumar)2004Partial report submitted
Vamsadhara2010Pending/partial
Mahadayi2010Award notified
Mahanadi2018Pending adjudication

Cauvery Water Dispute — complete timeline:

EventDateDetail
CWDT constitutedJune 2, 1990Headed by Justice Chittatosh Mookerjee
CWDT Final AwardFebruary 5, 2007After 17 years; total assumed water: 740 TMC/year
Supreme Court JudgmentFebruary 16, 2018Cauvery declared national asset; Centre to notify Cauvery Management Scheme; modified CWDT allocations

Cauvery 2018 SC allocation (modified from CWDT 2007):

State/UTCWDT 2007SC 2018
Tamil Nadu419 TMC404.25 TMC (reduced by 14.75)
Karnataka270 TMC284.75 TMC (increased by 14.75)
Kerala30 TMC30 TMC (unchanged)
Puducherry7 TMC7 TMC (unchanged)

SC verdict validity: 15 years from 2018.

Article 263 — Inter-State Council:

FeatureDetail
ConstitutedMay 28, 1990 (Presidential Order)
BasisRecommendation of Sarkaria Commission (report: 1988)
ChairmanPrime Minister (ex officio)
MembersChief Ministers of all states + UTs with legislatures; Administrators of UTs without legislatures; specified Union Cabinet Ministers
ReconstitutedNovember 2024 — PM Modi as chairman; 9 Union Ministers as core members + all CMs; 13 additional Union Ministers as invitees
FunctionsInquire into inter-state disputes; investigate subjects of common interest; recommend policy co-ordination between Centre and states
Article 263 powersThree: (a) arbitrate disputes between states; (b) investigate common interest subjects; (c) recommend for better co-ordination

Zonal Councils — five advisory bodies:

FeatureDetail
Established1956 under States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (NOT under Article 263 — statutory, not constitutional)
Number5 Zonal Councils (Northern, Central, Eastern, Western, Southern)
Separate bodyNorth-Eastern Council — established separately under NE Council Act, 1971
Common ChairmanUnion Home Minister chairs all 5 Zonal Councils
Vice-ChairmanChief Ministers of states in that zone rotate
FunctionsAdvisory: border disputes, inter-state transport, economic planning coordination, linguistic minority issues
NatureAdvisory, not legislative — recommendations not binding

UPSC synthesis: Inter-State relations = GS2 Federalism. Key exam facts: Article 262 = inter-state river disputes = Parliament can bar SC jurisdiction; 9 Tribunals under ISRWD Act 1956; Cauvery Tribunal = constituted June 2, 1990 = final award February 5, 2007 = SC verdict February 16, 2018 = Tamil Nadu 404.25 TMC + Karnataka 284.75 TMC; Article 263 = Inter-State Council = constituted May 28, 1990 = Sarkaria Commission recommendation = Chairman = PM = reconstituted November 2024; Zonal Councils = 5 = established under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT Article 263 — common confusion) = Chairman = Union Home Minister; NE Council = separate = 1971 Act. Prelims trap: Zonal Councils are under States Reorganisation Act 1956 (NOT Article 263 — Article 263 created the ISC; Zonal Councils are statutory, not constitutional); ISC Chairman = Prime Minister (NOT President and NOT Home Minister; Zonal Councils chairman = Home Minister); Cauvery SC 2018 = Tamil Nadu got reduced allocation (from 419 → 404.25 TMC) = Karnataka got increased (270 → 284.75 TMC); Article 262 allows Parliament to bar SC jurisdiction over river disputes (this is exceptional — Parliament has actually barred SC jurisdiction under the ISRWD Act); 9 Tribunals (NOT 6 or 7 — 9 total as of 2018 when Mahanadi was the latest).

Exam Strategy

Prelims traps:

  • Governor appointed by President (NOT elected — this is the key difference from the President at the Centre who is elected by an Electoral College)
  • Vidhan Parishad exists in ONLY 6 states (UP, Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana)
  • Article 356 = President's Rule; SR Bommai case (1994) restricted its misuse — floor test required
  • 91st Amendment (2003): Council of Ministers max = 15% of Vidhan Sabha strength
  • Education = Concurrent List (NOT State List — moved by 42nd Amendment 1976)
  • Governor's term = 5 years but serves at pleasure of President (can be removed any time)
  • Money Bill in states: Introduced in Vidhan Sabha only; Vidhan Parishad can delay max 14 days (parallel to Rajya Sabha's 14 days on money bills)

Practice Questions

Prelims:

  1. The Governor of a state is appointed by the:
    (a) Chief Justice of India
    (b) President of India
    (c) Prime Minister of India
    (d) State Legislature through proportional representation

  2. Which constitutional amendment set a limit of 15% of the total strength of the legislative assembly as the maximum size of a state's Council of Ministers?
    (a) 44th Amendment
    (b) 73rd Amendment
    (c) 91st Amendment
    (d) 100th Amendment

  3. The subject of "Education" is placed in which Schedule/List of the Constitution?
    (a) Union List
    (b) Concurrent List
    (c) State List
    (d) Residuary list (not enumerated)